Evolution of explorative and exploitative search strategies in collective foraging

Abstract

Evolutionary theories of foraging hypothesize that foraging strategies evolve to maximize search efficiency. Many studies have investigated the central trade-off between explore–exploit and how individual foragers manage it under various conditions. For foragers in groups, this trade-off can be affected by the social environment, influencing the evolution of individual search strategies. Previous work has shown that when learning socially, explorative search strategies can optimize group search efficiency. However, social learning can cause discrepancies in strategies that benefit the group versus an individual. We model the evolution of explorative and exploitative strategies using Lévy exponents under different levels of social learning and investigate their effect on individual and group search efficiencies. We show that reliance on social learning can lead to the evolution of mixed groups that are not optimally efficient. Exploiters can have a selective advantage in scrounging findings by explorers, but too many exploiters can diminish group efficiencies. However, greater opportunities for social learning can increase the benefits of explorative strategies. Finally, we show that area-restricted search can help individuals balance exploration and exploitation, and make groups more efficient. Our results demonstrate how exploration and exploitation must be balanced at both individual and collective levels for efficient search.