Dopamine in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo imaging studies

Author:

Mizuno Yuya123ORCID,Ashok Abhishekh Hulegar1456ORCID,Bhat Bhagyashree Bhaskar7,Jauhar Sameer28ORCID,Howes Oliver D1249

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

2. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

3. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

4. Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK

5. Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

6. Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

7. Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

8. Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

9. Psychiatric Imaging Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of global disability. Several lines of evidence implicate the dopamine system in its pathophysiology. However, the magnitude and consistency of the findings are unknown. We address this by systematically reviewing in vivo imaging evidence for dopamine measures in MDD and meta-analysing these where there are sufficient studies. Methods: Studies investigating the dopaminergic system using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography in MDD and a control group were included. Demographic, clinical and imaging measures were extracted from each study, and meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: We identified 43 studies including 662 patients and 801 controls. Meta-analysis of 38 studies showed no difference in mean or mean variability of striatal D2/3 receptor availability ( g = 0.06, p = 0.620), or combined dopamine synthesis and release capacity ( g = 0.19, p = 0.309). Dopamine transporter (DAT) availability was lower in the MDD group in studies using DAT selective tracers ( g = −0.56, p = 0.006), but not when tracers with an affinity for serotonin transporters were included ( g = −0.21, p = 0.420). Subgroup analysis showed greater dopamine release ( g = 0.49, p = 0.030), but no difference in dopamine synthesis capacity ( g = −0.21, p = 0.434) in the MDD group. Striatal D1 receptor availability was lower in patients with MDD in two studies. Conclusions: The meta-analysis indicates striatal DAT availability is lower, but D2/3 receptor availability is not altered in people with MDD compared to healthy controls. There may be greater dopamine release and lower striatal D1 receptors in MDD, although further studies are warranted. We discuss factors associated with these findings, discrepancies with preclinical literature and implications for future research.

Funder

Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3