A framework for assessment of adverse events occurring in psychedelic-assisted therapies

Author:

Palitsky Roman123ORCID,Kaplan Deanna M134,Perna John2,Bosshardt Zachary2,Maples-Keller Jessica L2ORCID,Levin-Aspenson Holly F5,Zarrabi Ali John136,Peacock Caroline137,Mletzko Tanja12,Rothbaum Barbara O12,Raison Charles L13ORCID,Grant George H13,Dunlop Boadie W12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Emory Center for Psychedelics and Spirituality, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

3. Emory Spiritual Health, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

4. Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

5. Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

6. Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

7. Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

Objective: Despite considerable research examining the efficacy of psychedelic-assisted therapies (PATs) for treating psychiatric disorders, assessment of adverse events (AEs) in PAT research has lagged. Current AE reporting standards in PAT trials are poorly calibrated to features of PAT that distinguish it from other treatments, leaving many potential AEs unassessed. Methods: A multidisciplinary working group of experts involved in PAT pooled formally and informally documented AEs observed through research experience and published literature. This information was integrated with (a) current standards and practices for AE reporting in pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy trials and (b) published findings documenting post-acute dosing impacts of psychedelics on subjective states, meaning, and psychosocial health variables, to produce a set of AE constructs important to evaluate in PAT as well as recommended methods and time frames for their assessment and monitoring. Correspondence between identified potential AEs and current standards for AE assessment was examined, including the extent of coverage of identified AE constructs by 25 existing measures used in relevant research. Results: Fifty-four potential AE terms warranting systematized assessment in PAT were identified, defined, and categorized. Existing measures demonstrated substantial gaps in their coverage of identified AE constructs. Recommendations were developed for how to assess PAT AEs (including patient, clinician, and informant reports), and when to assess over preparation, dosing session, integration, and follow-up. Application of this framework is demonstrated in a preliminary assessment protocol (available in the supplement). Conclusions: This assessment framework addresses the need to capture post-acute dosing AEs in PAT, accounting for its pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy components, as well as documented impacts of psychedelics on worldviews and spirituality.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3