Exploring possibilities for a feminist ethic of collective care in suicide research

Author:

Marzetti Hazel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Suicide is a major public health concern responsible for around 700,000 deaths globally every year. In response, researchers worldwide seek to understand suicide and suicide prevention, primarily using quantitative methods. As such, the development of qualitative methods tailored for the complexities of working with participants, for whom the primary ethical concern occupying researchers and ethics committees alike is whether taking part in the research will increase suicidal distress and contribute to a greater risk of dying by suicide, is in its infancy. Seeking to address this gap, in this article, I draw on feminist research methods to explore the unique design considerations and challenges faced when doing interview-based, qualitative suicide research. I argue that qualitative suicide research must resist risk focussed approaches to ethics, and instead reframe our ethical decision-making to centre a feminist ethic of care, drawing on Brannelly and Barnes’ concept of “care-full” research practices. Central to this reframing is recognition of the ways in which reciprocal relationships between researchers, research participants, and research institutions are inherent to qualitative research, meaning that no single research actor can be thought of in isolation from the other, necessitating a relational approach to our feminist research ethic.

Funder

MVLS Studentship, University of Glasgow

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3