Abstract
The author warns against accepting the concept of unconscious bias (measured by a supposedly scientific cognitive function test) as the explanation for racism and the terrain on which it should be combatted. Using the writings of Sivanandan, in which he distinguished between attitude, action and state or institutional racism, she traces the different ways over time in which racism has been camouflaged by the use of words such as xenophobia or disadvantage, and hails the landmark acceptance of institutional racism in 1999. Returning racism to individual attitude (if unconscious) means not distinguishing between the ways in which racism affects classes and communities differentially, not distinguishing between ‘the racism that kills’ and ‘the racism that discriminates’, and suggests, wrongly, in a non-materialist way, that bias creates rather than reflects structured and institutional racism.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Archaeology,Anthropology,Archaeology,Cultural Studies
Reference11 articles.
1. RAT and the degradation of black struggle
2. Critical Race Theory identifies power structures as based on white privilege and white supremacy, which perpetuates ‘the marginalisation of people of colour’.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献