Algorithm for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Classic and New Procedures

Author:

Hinckel Betina B.1,Thomas Dimitri2,Vellios Evan E.3ORCID,Hancock Kyle John4,Calcei Jacob G.5ORCID,Sherman Seth L.6,Eliasberg Claire D.7,Fernandes Tiago L.8ORCID,Farr Jack9,Lattermann Christian10,Gomoll Andreas H.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Taylor, MI, USA

2. UNC Orthopedics and Sports Medicine at Lenoir, Kinston, NC, USA

3. Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgeon Southern California Orthopedic Institute (SCOI), Van Nuys, CA, USA

4. Desert Orthopaedic Center, Las Vegas, NV, USA

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

6. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA

7. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA

8. University of São Paulo, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sports Medicine–FIFA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

9. OrthoIndy Knee Preservation and Cartilage Restoration Center, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA

10. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Objective To create a treatment algorithm for focal grade 3 or 4 cartilage defects of the knee using both classic and novel cartilage restoration techniques. Design A comprehensive review of the literature was performed highlighting classic as well as novel cartilage restoration techniques supported by clinical and/or basic science research and currently being employed by orthopedic surgeons. Results There is a high level of evidence to support the treatment of small to medium size lesions (<2-4 cm2) without subchondral bone involvement with traditional techniques such as marrow stimulation, osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT), or osteochondral allograft transplant (OCA). Newer techniques such as autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate concentrate implantation have also been shown to be effective in select studies. If subchondral bone loss is present OAT or OCA should be performed. For large lesions (>4 cm2), OCA or matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) may be performed. OCA is preferred over MACI in the setting of subchondral bone involvement while cell-based modalities such as MACI or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage are preferred in the patellofemoral joint. Conclusions Numerous techniques exist for the orthopedic surgeon treating focal cartilage defects of the knee. Treatment strategies should be based on lesion size, lesion location, subchondral bone involvement, and the level of evidence supporting each technique in the literature.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Biomedical Engineering,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3