The updated PIM-Taiwan criteria: a list of potentially inappropriate medications in older people

Author:

Chang Chirn-Bin123ORCID,Lai Hsiu-Yun4,Hwang Shinn-Jang56,Yang Shu-Yu78,Wu Ru-Shu9,Chang Lo-Yu10,Lee I-Shan2,Liu Hsing-Cheng1112,Chan Ding-Cheng13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Chu-Tung Branch, Hsin-Chu County

2. Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei

3. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei

4. Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu City

5. Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei

6. National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei

7. College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei

8. Department of Pharmacy, Songde Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei

9. Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei

10. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei

11. Taipei City Psychiatry Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei

12. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei

13. Superintendent, National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, No. 52, Zhishan Road, Zhudong Township, Hsinchu County, 31064 Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei

Abstract

Background: Explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) developed for other countries are difficult to apply to a specific territory. This study aimed to update the PIM-Taiwan criteria from a qualitative review of several published PIM criteria, followed by consensus among regional experts in Taiwan. Methods: After a review of the literature, we selected four sets of published PIM criteria to construct preliminary core PIMs. The Beers criteria, Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA), and Japan criteria were used for PIMs, without consideration of chronic diseases. The Beers criteria, Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, and Japan criteria were used for PIMs with respect to chronic diseases. We asked experts ( n = 24) to rate their agreement with each statement, including in the final PIM criteria, after two rounds of modified Delphi methods. The intraclass coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the reliability of the modified Delphi method. Results: Overall, two categories of PIMs were established: 131 individual drugs and 9 drugs with combinations that should generally be avoided; and 9 chronic diseases with their corresponding PIMs that have drug–disease interactions. The ICC estimates for PIMs to be avoided generally were 0.634 and 0.557 (round 1 and 2) and those for PIMs with respect to chronic diseases were 0.866 and 0.775 (round 1 and 2) of the Delphi method, respectively. Conclusions: The 2018 version of PIM-Taiwan criteria was established and several modifications were made to keep the criteria updated and relevant. Clinicians can use them to reduce polypharmacy and PIMs among older patients.

Funder

National Taiwan University Hospital

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3