Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Arthroscopic Repair Versus Debridement for Partial Subscapularis Tendon Tears More Than Half of the Entire First Facet

Author:

Jeong Jeung Yeol1,Kim Su Cheol2,Lee Sang Min3,Yoo Jae Chul3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, Dongtan, Republic of Korea

2. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background: Most outcome studies on subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears have focused on large SSC tears rather than partial SSC tendon tears. Therefore, the optimal treatment for partial SSC tendon tears more than half of the first facet of the entire SSC footprint has not yet been clearly defined. Purpose: To prospectively investigate the clinical and radiological results between the arthroscopic repair group and the debridement group in SSC partial tear (Yoo and Rhee classification, type 2B: SSC tendon tears of more than half of the entire first facet). Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 65 patients with SSC tendon type 2B tears were randomized to arthroscopic debridement (n = 33) or arthroscopic repair (n = 32). Clinical evaluation of the patients was performed on the day before surgery and 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively using active range of motion measurements and other validated scores (pain visual analog scale scores, function visual analog scale scores, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score). In addition, SSC muscle strength was measured using instruments in the belly-press position. Magnetic resonance imaging (upper and lower SSC muscle diameters, Goutallier grades) was performed on the day before operation as well as 6 months and 2 years postoperatively. Results: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the arthroscopic debridement and arthroscopic repair groups with respect to active range of motion, pain visual analog scale scores, function visual analog scale scores, Constant scores, or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. There was a statistically significant increase in SSC muscle strength in the repair group compared with the debridement group at 5 years postoperatively ( P = .013). Magnetic resonance imaging assessment was also not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusion: There were no differences in the patient-reported outcomes of patients with partial SSC tears treated with either arthroscopic debridement or repair, although there was an increase in SSC muscle strength associated with repair, the clinical importance of which may warrant further research. Registration: NCT03183466 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3