Effect of Quality of Repair on Clinical and Structural Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair

Abstract

Background: Anatomic repair of a torn rotator cuff tendon on the greater tuberosity (GT) is an important surgical goal in rotator cuff repair. However, few studies have investigated whether the efforts made to maximize coverage of the GT are associated with the clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery. Purpose: To investigate whether the quality of repair at the time of surgery is associated with clinical and structural outcomes after surgery and to identify factors influencing the quality of repair. Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 141 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2008 and 2016. All repairs were classified according to the amount of postoperative GT coverage: A, complete coverage of the GT (n = 96); B, incomplete coverage, comprising more than half of GT (n = 27); C, incomplete coverage, comprising less than half of the GT (n = 16); and D, exposure of the glenohumeral joint (n = 2). All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging 1 year after surgery. Clinical outcomes and structural integrity based on Sugaya classification were assessed 2 years and 1 year after surgery, respectively. Preoperative factors associated with the postoperative GT coverage (measured at the close of surgery) were identified using a multivariable proportional odds cumulative logit model. Results: The forward flexion strength in group A (10.3 ± 4.6 lb) was significantly greater than that in group C (6.5 ± 3.7 lb) ( P = .003) 2 years after surgery. The postoperative Constant score in group A (76.6 ± 11.5) was greater than that in group C (66.7 ± 15.6) ( P = .018). The number of cases that showed retearing of the repaired tendon was as follows: group A (5/96; 5.2%), group B (7/27; 25.9%), and group C (10/16; 62.5%). There was no significant difference in the changes of pain visual analog scale scores among groups 2 years after surgery (all P > .05). Also, there was no significant difference in the changes of range of motion in all directions among groups 2 years after surgery (all P > .05). Patients with preoperative GT coverage B included in the postoperative GT coverage groups through surgery were as follows: group A (23/45; 51.1%), group B (17/45; 37.8%), and group C (5/45; 11.1%). Preoperative GT coverage was the only independent factor that was associated with GT coverage in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Quality of repair, measured as the extent of postoperative GT coverage at the time of surgery, was associated with clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair surgery.