Observational Study of Anaesthetists’ Fresh Gas Flow Rates during Anaesthesia with Desflurane, Isoflurane and Sevoflurane

Author:

Dexter F.12,Maguire D.13,Epstein R. H.13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa and Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

2. University of Iowa.

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College.

Abstract

Reducing excessive fresh gas flow rates (FGF) is an established and simple strategy to reduce the administration of volatile anaesthetic agents. We studied clinicians’ FGF use to understand better why two previous clinical trials achieved significant reductions in FGF by using feedback to anaesthetists. Anaesthesia information management system data from a US academic medical centre were analysed retrospectively. One year of data starting from July 2008 had 11,170 cases. Fresh gas flow rates were measured each minute during cases. Anaesthetists were more likely to choose FGF of multiples of 1 l/minute and 0.5 l/minute than random. However, the pattern was too inconsistent to be of economic or psychological importance and thus is not needed when describing a target FGF. Cumulative distributions of FGF were shifted to the left for desflurane and isoflurane compared to sevoflurane (i.e. cost comparisons among agents may need to use different target FGF). Variation in mean FGF among anaesthetists was small. Even if all anaesthetists had identical mean FGF, the standard deviation of FGF among cases would be reduced by less than 0.1 l/minute for all agents. Most of the achievable reductions in FGF were small reductions in FGF for the many cases with <3 l/minute. These results show that departments choosing to use inexpensive automatic email feedback on FGF should target all anaesthetists and focus on variation in FGF among anaesthetists’ cases.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3