Improving Methods for Measuring Quality of Care

Author:

Bokhour Barbara G.1,Pugh Mary Jo2,Rao Jaya K.3,Avetisyan Ruzan4,Berlowitz Dan R.5,Kazis Lewis E.5

Affiliation:

1. Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bedford, MA, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston

2. South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Veterans Evidence-Based Research Dissemination Implementation Center Research Enhancement Award Program, San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

3. Healthy Aging Program, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

4. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston

5. Center for Health, Quality, Outcomes & Economic Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bedford, MA, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston

Abstract

As health care systems seek to provide patient-centered care as a cornerstone of quality, how to measure this aspect of quality has become a concern. Previous development of quality indicators for treating individual chronic disease has rarely included patient perspectives on quality of care. Using epilepsy as an exemplar, the authors sought to develop an approach to measuring patient-centered quality of care. They conducted six focus groups with adults with epilepsy. Using qualitative methods, the authors initially identified 10 patient-generated quality indicators, 5 of which were subsequently rated, along with literature-based quality indicators, by an expert panel using a modified RAND appropriateness methodology. The authors discuss similarities and differences in aspects of care patients and providers value as essential for good quality. The process presented in this article may serve as a model for incorporating patient perceptions of quality into the future development of quality indicators for chronic diseases.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. Treatment of epilepsy in general hospitals: do patients and neurologists agree on success or failure?

2. Doctors, Drugs, and Driving — Tort Liability for Patient-Caused Accidents

3. Depression but not seizure frequency predicts quality of life in treatment-resistant epilepsy

4. Brook, R. (1994). The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method. In K. McCormick, S. Moore, & R. Siegel (Eds.), Clinical practice guideline development: Methodology perspectives (pp. 59-70). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy & Research .

5. The Effects of Patient Communication Skills Training on Compliance

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3