Accuracy of telephone screening tools to identify dementia patients remotely: systematic review

Author:

Riley Charlotte Olivia1ORCID,McKinstry Brian1ORCID,Fairhurst Karen1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Summary The COVID19 pandemic highlighted the need for remote diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia. Telephone screening for dementia may facilitate prompt diagnosis and optimisation of care. However, it is not clear how accurate telephone screening tools are compared with face-to-face screening. We searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus for all English language papers published between January 1975 and February 2021 which compared telephone screening for dementia/ mild cognitive impairment and an in-person reference standard, performed within six-weeks. We subsequently searched paper reference lists and contacted authors if data were missing. Three reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed study quality using an adapted version of the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Twenty-one studies including 944 participants were found. No one test appears more accurate, with similar validities as in-person testing. Cut-offs for screening differed between studies based on demographics and acceptability thresholds and meta-analysis was not appropriate. Overall the results suggest telephone screening is acceptably sensitive and specific however, given the limited data, this finding must be treated with some caution. It may not be suitable for those with hearing impairments and anxiety around technology. Few studies were carried out in general practice where most screening occurs and further research is recommended in such lower prevalence environments.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference64 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]. Clinical Knowledge Summaries: Dementia. 2020. https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/dementia/.

2. World Health Organisation. Dementia 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia.

3. World Health Organisation. Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017-2025. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2017. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259615/9789241513487-eng.pdf;jsessionid=D684D2A563E5DD2D50C71D1E36C570CE?sequence=1.

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]. NICE impact dementia. 2020. https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/Into-practice/measuring-uptake/dementia-impact-report/nice-impact-dementia.pdf.

5. NHS Digital. Recorded Dementia Diagnoses, https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/recorded-dementia-diagnoses.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3