Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews

Author:

Pollock Alex1ORCID,Campbell Pauline2,Struthers Caroline3,Synnot Anneliese45,Nunn Jack6,Hill Sophie7,Goodare Heather8,Morris Jacqui9,Watts Chris10,Morley Richard11

Affiliation:

1. Senior Research Fellow, Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK

2. Research Fellow, Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK

3. Education and Training Manager, EQUATOR Network, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, UK

4. Research Fellow, Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia

5. Research Fellow, Cochrane Consumers and Communication, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Australia

6. Graduate Researcher, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia

7. Associate Professor, Cochrane Consumers and Communication, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Australia

8. Consumer Representative with Experience of Cancer and Stroke, UK

9. Reader in Rehabilitation Research, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, UK

10. Learning and Support Manager, Cochrane Learning and Support Department, Cochrane Central Executive, UK

11. Consumer Engagement Officer, Cochrane Consumer Network, UK

Abstract

Objectives Involvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews. Methods We developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-defined constructs, including: who was involved, how stakeholders were recruited, the mode of involvement, at what stage there was involvement and the level of control or influence. Results The final ACTIVE framework described whether patients, carers and/or families, and/or other stakeholders (including health professionals, health decision makers and funders) were involved. We defined: recruitment as either open or closed; the approach to involvement as either one-time, continuous or combined; and the method of involvement as either direct or indirect. The stage of involvement in reviews was defined using the Cochrane Ecosystem stages of a review. The level of control or influence was defined according to the roles and activities of stakeholders in the review process, and described as the ACTIVE continuum of involvement. Conclusions The ACTIVE framework provides a structure with which to describe key components of stakeholder involvement within a systematic review, and we have used this to summarize how stakeholders have been involved in a subset of varied systematic reviews. The ACTIVE continuum of involvement provides a new model that uses tasks and roles to detail the level of stakeholder involvement. This work has contributed to the development of learning resources aimed at supporting systematic review authors and editors to involve stakeholders in their systematic reviews. The ACTIVE framework may support the decision-making of systematic review authors in planning how to involve stakeholders in future reviews.

Funder

Learning and Support Department and Consumer Network Co-ordinator, Cochrane Central Executive

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3