Engaging health care professionals in quality improvement: A qualitative study exploring the synergies between projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation in quality improvement collaborative implementation in Denmark

Author:

Carstensen Kathrine1ORCID,Goldman Joanne2ORCID,Kjeldsen Anne Mette3ORCID,Lou Stina4ORCID,Nielsen Camilla Palmhøj5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. PhD Student, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, and Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

2. Assistant Professor, Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety and Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

3. Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

4. Senior Researcher and Associate Professor, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

5. Research Director and Associate Professor, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region and Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

Abstract

Objective To examine the projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation forming health care professions’ engagement in quality improvement collaborative (QIC) implementation in Denmark, and to analyse the synergies and tensions between the two projects given the opportunities afforded by the QICs. Methods This was a cross-sectional interview study with professionals involved in the implementation of two national QICs in Denmark involving 23 individual interviews and focus group discussions with 75 people representing different professional groups. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the data, drawing on institutional contributions to organisational studies of professions. Results Study participants engaged widely in QIC implementation. This engagement was formed by a constructive interplay between the professions’ projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation, with only few tensions identified. The project of professionalisation relates to a self-oriented agenda of contributing professional expertise and promoting professional recognition and development, while the project of institutionalisation focuses on improving health care processes and outcomes and advancing quality improvement. Both projects were largely similar across professional groups. The interplay between the two projects was enabled by the bottom-up approach to implementation, participation of QI specialists, and a clear focus on developing and delivering high-quality patient care. Conclusions Future strategies for QIC implementation should position QICs as a framework that promotes the integration of professions’ projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation to successfully engage professionals in the implementation process, and thereby optimise the effectiveness of QICs in health care.

Funder

Aarhus University, Graduate School of Health Sciences

Defactum, Central Denmark Region

Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3