Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review

Author:

Marshall Lindsay J.1ORCID,Bailey Jarrod2,Cassotta Manuela3,Herrmann Kathrin4ORCID,Pistollato Francesca5

Affiliation:

1. Animal Research Issues, The Humane Society of the United States, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

2. Cruelty Free International, London, UK; Animal Free Research UK, London, UK

3. Oltre la Sperimentazione Animale (OSA), Milan, Italy

4. Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Baltimore, MD, USA; Senate Department for the Environment, Urban Mobility, Consumer Protection and Climate Action, Berlin, Germany

5. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

Abstract

The failure rate for the translation of drugs from animal testing to human treatments remains at over 92%, where it has been for the past few decades. The majority of these failures are due to unexpected toxicity — that is, safety issues revealed in human trials that were not apparent in animal tests — or lack of efficacy. However, the use of more innovative tools, such as organs-on-chips, in the preclinical pipeline for drug testing, has revealed that these tools are more able to predict unexpected safety events prior to clinical trials and so can be used for this, as well as for efficacy testing. Here, we review several disease areas, and consider how the use of animal models has failed to offer effective new treatments. We also make some suggestions as to how the more human-relevant new approach methodologies might be applied to address this.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,Toxicology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference251 articles.

1. European Commission. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. 2019 Report on the statistics on the use of animals for scientific purposes in the Member States of the European Union in 2015–2017. Luxemborg: Publications Office of the EU, 2020, 20 pp.

2. Clinical impact of high-profile animal-based research reported in the UK national press

3. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3