Dexmedetomidine versus Morphine or Fentanyl in the Management of Children after Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

He Xing-Ying,Cao Jian-Ping,Shi Xue-Yin,Zhang Hao

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this review was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride with the efficacy and safety of opioids for postoperative management of children after tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) in the Cochrane Library (most recent issue), Medline (1966 to date) through Ovid, Embase (1980 to date), and Web of Science (1945 to date). The number of patients who required rescue analgesics (morphine or fentanyl) in the postanesthesia care unit, the number of patients with emergence agitation, the number of patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting, the time to eye-opening in response to verbal stimuli, and the time to extubation were analyzed. Results: We included 5 trials, consisting of 482 patients in total. There were no significant differences in the number of patients who required rescue analgesics in the postanesthesia care unit, the number of patients with emergence agitation, the number of patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting, or the time to extubation between patients who received dexmedetomidine and those who received opioids. Compared with opioids, dexmedetomidine was associated with a significantly decreased time to eye-opening in response to verbal stimuli (mean difference, −2.11 minutes; 95% confidence interval, −3.32 to −0.91 minutes; p = 0.0006). Conclusions: Intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine was as effective as opioids in preventing postoperative pain and emergence agitation in children who had undergone tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3