Comparative Functional Effect of Alternative Surgical Techniques Used in Rhinoplasty

Author:

Xavier Rui1ORCID,Azeredo-Lopes Sofia2,Menger Dirk Jan3,Carvalho Henrique Cyrne de4ORCID,Spratley Jorge5

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Luz Arrabida, Porto, Portugal

2. Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) and EpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

3. University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

4. Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

5. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S.João and Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Rhinoplasty makes use of a combination of surgical techniques selected to address the specific requirements of each individual nose. Several different surgical techniques may be used for addressing each section of the nose, with possible different functional effects. Objective: The purpose of this investigation is to compare the functional effect of the different surgical techniques used for addressing each section of the nose. Methods: Prospective study of 57 consecutive rhinoplasty patients. Patients were evaluated with peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for nasal obstruction before and 1 year after rhinoplasty. Additionally, esthetic evaluation of the nose was obtained with Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE). According to the surgical technique used to address each portion of the nose, groups of patients were created and the functional improvement of these groups was compared. Results: Using the TukeyHSD multiple pairwise-comparison test, the estimated difference of the increase of PNIF between using spreader grafts and using spreader flaps was 94.9 (95% CI 24.3, 165.5, P = .004) between spreader grafts and neither grafts or flaps was 79.2 (95% CI 5.8, 152.6, P = .03), between spreader grafts and bilateral spreader flaps plus a unilateral spreader graft was 90.2 (95% CI 22.1, 158.2, P = .005). In all other portions of the nose, no significant difference was found in the functional improvement between different surgical techniques. Conclusions: Spreader grafts increase PNIF more significantly than other surgical techniques used for dorsal mid-vault reconstruction. Spreader grafts should be preferred over other techniques whenever an improvement of nasal airflow is required. No significant differences were found between the functional effect of alternative techniques used in other sections of the nose. Additional cohort studies will be necessary to further confirm data from this investigation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Way Forward in Improving Rhinoplasty Outcomes;Facial Plastic Surgery;2023-11-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3