Survival Trends and Profiling of Gastric Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma (gMANEC) in the Current Era

Author:

Gupta Shreya1,McDonald James D.2,Rossi Alexander J.3,Hernandez Jonathan M.4,Davis Jeremy L.4,Blakely Andrew M.4

Affiliation:

1. University Hospital, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

2. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA

3. Rutgers- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

4. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Abstract

Background: Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (gMANEC) is a histopathologic diagnosis with at least 30% each of exocrine and endocrine components. Although prognosis is thought to be driven by the relative exocrine or endocrine dominance, gMANEC has been clinically treated as gastric adenocarcinoma (gAC). The overall survival of gMANEC as compared to gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (gNEC) or gAC remains undefined. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, patients with gastric tumors were queried from 2004 to 2016 for gMANEC, gNEC, and gAC histologies. Demographic and clinicopathologic features were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to delineate factors associated with overall survival (OS). Results: Overall, 404 patients diagnosed with gMANEC were identified. Patients had a median age 68 years, were majority male, and predominantly Caucasian. Gastric MANEC was more frequently poorly differentiated (73%vs 52% (gAC) vs 20% (gNEC), P < .001) with lymphovascular invasion (57%vs 38%vs 27%, P < .001) and lymph node involvement (59%vs 49%vs 36%, P < .001); these factors were associated with worse OS on univariable analysis. Finally, tumors >5 cm and lymph node involvement were independent predictors of worse survival. The median OS of patients with gMANEC was 41.5 months. Conclusion: Gastric MANEC and gAC have a similarly dismal prognosis and thus should be continued to treat like gAC. Pathologic nodal metastasis, tumor size and grade are useful prognostic factors.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3