Evaluation of Sequential Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream Infections

Author:

Loudermilk Carly12ORCID,Eudy Joshua1,Albrecht Stephanie1,Slaton Cara N.3,Stramel Stefanie4,Tu Patrick5ORCID,Albrecht Benjamin6,Green Sarah B.6ORCID,Bouchard Jeannette L.78,Orvin Alison I.7ORCID,Caveness Christian F.7ORCID,Newsome Andrea Sikora19ORCID,Bland Christopher M.910ORCID,Anderson Daniel T.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, WellStar MCG Health, Augusta, GA, USA

2. Department of Pharmacy, UofL Health, UofL Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA

3. Department of Pharmacy, Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA

4. Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA

5. Department of Pharmacy, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA

6. Department of Pharmacy, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA

7. Department of Pharmacy, WakeMed Health and Hospitals, Raleigh, NC, USA

8. Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network, Durham, NC, USA

9. Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Savannah, GA, USA

10. Department of Pharmacy, St. Joseph’s/Candler Health System, Savannah, GA, USA

Abstract

Background: Intravenous (IV) antibiotics have historically been considered standard of care for treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs). Recent literature has shown sequential oral (PO) therapy to be noninferior to IV antibiotics for certain pathogens and disease states. However, a gap exists in the literature for BSI caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Objective: To compare outcomes of definitive sequential PO therapy to definitive IV therapy in patients with E faecalis BSI. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort study of adult patients with at least one blood culture positive for E faecalis from January 2017 to November 2022. Patients with polymicrobial BSI, concomitant infections requiring prolonged IV antibiotic therapy, those who did not receive antibiotic therapy, and those who died within 72 hours of index culture were excluded. Subjects were matched based on source of infection in a 2:1 (IV:PO) ratio. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), antibiotic duration, and 30-day readmission rate. Results: Of the 186 patients who met criteria for inclusion, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary composite outcome for PO compared to IV therapy (14.5% vs 21.8%; OR 0.53 [0.23-1.25]) or 30-day readmission (17.5% vs 29%; OR 0.53 [0.25-1.13]). Hospital LOS was significantly longer in patients receiving IV-only therapy (6 days vs 14 days; P < 0.001). Conclusion and Relevance: Sequential oral therapy for E faecalis BSI had similar outcomes compared to IV-only treatment and may be considered in eligible patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3