Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations

Author:

Beech Nic1,Burns Harry2,de Caestecker Linda3,MacIntosh Robert4,MacLean Donald5

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Business, Strathclyde University,

2. Greater Glasgow NHS Board,

3. Greater Glasgow NHS Board and Women and Children’s Unit of the Health Department,

4. Graduate School of Business, University of Strathclyde,

5. University of Glasgow,

Abstract

It has been argued that organizational life typically contains paradoxical situations such as efforts to manage change which nonetheless seem to reinforce inertia. Four logical options for coping with paradox have been explicated, three of which seek resolution and one of which ‘keeps the paradox open’. The purpose of this article is to explore the potential for managerial action where the paradox is held open through the use of theory on ‘serious playfulness’. Our argument is that paradoxes, as intrinsic features in organizational life, cannot always be resolved through cognitive processes. What may be possible, however, is that such paradoxes are transformed, or ‘moved on’ through action and as a result the overall change effort need not be stalled by the existence of embedded paradoxes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cited by 135 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Die Dreidimensionalität der Organisationsparadoxie – Prozessstudie eines Krankenhauses im Umgang mit der COVID-19 Pandemie;Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO);2024-08-29

2. Paradoxes and Coping Practices in AI Servitization: An Exploratory Study of Four Chinese Manufacturers;2024 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET);2024-08-04

3. Widerspruch und/oder Paradoxie?;Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO);2024-06-19

4. A longitudinal analysis of judgement approaches to sustainability paradoxes;Tourism Management;2024-06

5. It Takes a Fool to Remain Sane: How and When HR Executives Use Jesting Techniques to Trickle Up Paradoxical Tensions;Journal of Management Inquiry;2024-03-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3