Descriptive Analysis of the Long Head of the Biceps Abnormalities in Distal Isolated Supraspinatus Tears Based on Video Records: A Study From the SFA Biceps Study Group Using the “Biceps Box” Concept

Author:

Barth Johannes12,Berhouet Julien3,Gallinet David4,Antoni Maxime5,Dordain Franck6ORCID,Bonnevialle Nicolas7,Guery Jacques8,Gadea François9,Jacquot Adrien10,Charousset Christophe11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinique des Cedres, Echirolles, France

2. Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpe Hôpital Sud, Grenoble, France

3. Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHRU Trousseau, Faculté de Médecine de Tours, Université de Tours, Chambray-les-Tours, France

4. Centre Epaule Main Besançon, Clinique Saint Vincent - ELSAN, Besançon, France

5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

6. Hôpital Privé Saint Martin, Caen, France

7. Chirurgie de l’Epaule, Clinique Universitaire du Sport, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France

8. Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Polyclinique du Val de Loire, Nevers, France

9. Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Hôpital Privé Toulon Hyeres, Saint-Roch, France

10. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Le Centre ARTIC·S, Essey-lès-Nancy, France

11. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinique Turin, Paris, France

Abstract

Background: Considering the long head of biceps (LHB) management, important cultural differences exist among the surgeons around the world, especially when repairing small isolated distal supraspinatus tears under arthroscopy. In the perspective of an international survey to analyze our practice regarding biceps management in small rotator cuff tears, the aim is to collect all the possible LHB abnormalities according to literature review, before considering that the LHB could be normal or pathologic. Indications: The SFA (Société Francophone d’Arthroscopie) behind its research biceps group summarized these abnormalities in a description analysis called the “biceps box” concept, which was validated with a strong inter-rater reliability. The aim is to present the description analysis using a common language with short video records for each abnormality described to reproduce “intraoperatively” the different possible scenarios the surgeon has to encounter during arthroscopic evaluation. Technique Description: The description of the “biceps box” concept classifies lesions of the LHB, with so-called intrinsic lesions, for which the LHB should be considered pathological: partial rupture or delamination, fissuring, lateral or medial instability or subluxation, hypertrophy with an hourglass figure; and so-called extrinsic lesions, for which the LHB should be considered healthy: damage to the pulley without bicipital instability, exposure of the articular portion of the biceps by rupture of the supraspinatus tendon, inflammation of the superficial surface of the tendon, presence of type 1 or 2 superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, or a chondral print. Results: We present the 10 possible scenarios with video records according to our description analysis. Discussion/Conclusion: The LHB could be considered as a pain generator in certain situations which are still not completely clear. The indication of biceps tenotomy or tenodesis depends on the interpretation of the surgeon of these abnormalities as a pathologic or a normal condition. The next step is to use these videos in an international survey to assess cultural differences regarding the management and eventually find a consensus regarding treatment options for each abnormality. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3