Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Urban Research Center Utrecht (URU), Netherlands Center for Geographical Information (NexpRI), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Abstract
Over the course of many years, professional planners have used a plethora of methods and tools to support their planning activities. Nevertheless, it can be argued that planning practioners have never fully embraced the much wider diversity of available methods, techniques, and models developed in the research laboratories. On the basis of this observation, this study poses several questions about why there is an apparent mismatch in planning practice between supply, demand, and applications of planning-support instruments (including ‘planning support systems’) and their outcomes (dedicated information and knowledge), and how this mismatch can be solved. In order to arrive at an answer, a conceptual framework is constructed, which constitutes crucial factors that influence the potential planning support roles of information, knowledge, and instruments. With the help of this framework, a developmental overview is interpreted of the theoretical planning traditions that exerted an influence on planning practice during the last half millennium in the Western world. From this interpretation, some lessons can be learned about the improvement of the planning-support role in factual planning practice, and moreover, it opens up some new questions and discussion points.
Subject
General Environmental Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
91 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. From PSScience to digital planning: Steps towards an integrated research and practice agenda for digital planning;Computers, Environment and Urban Systems;2024-12
2. The Role of Diversified Geo-Information Technologies in Urban Governance: A Literature Review;Land;2024-09-02
3. A missed opportunity to implement a 3D digital twin in strategic planning in the Ålesund region, Norway: What to blame?Yttredal, E.R., Cruickshank, J.A., Folkestad, B., Bårdseth, G.A. & Straume, K.2024. A missed opportunity to implement a 3D digital twin in strategic planning in the Ålesund region, Norway: What to blame?
Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography
Vol. 78, 61–72. ISSN 0029-1951.;Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography;2024-03-14
4. Embedding planning support systems in spatial planning practice: the role of drift in implementing the Spatial Development Framework methodology;International Planning Studies;2024-01-25
5. The contextualization of smart city technologies: An international comparison;Journal of Urban Management;2023-03