Effect of Backpack Loads on the Timing of Cardiopulmonary Response in Healthy Men
Author:
Lee Chungil1, Choi Jiho1, Jo Hojoon1, Lee Jiyeon2, Lee Dongyeop1, Hong Jiheon1, Yu Jaeho1, Kim Seonggil1, Kim Jinseop1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Physical Therapy, Sunmoon University, Chungcheongnam-do, Asan-si, SOUTH KOREA 2. Digital Healthcare Research Institute, Sunmoon University, Chungcheongnam-do, Asan-si, SOUTH KOREA
Abstract
The backpack used commonly affects posture and physical performance, resulting in increased oxygen uptake and energy expenditure. The purpose of this study is to confirm the effect of the chest loads on the reaching time of the cardiopulmonary response. Seventeen healthy men participants were monitored for cardiopulmonary function continuously during walking exercise with the Ramp protocol and recorded the time taken to reach THR, VO2 peak, RR Difference, maximal METs, maximal FECO2, and minimum FEO2. During the exercise test, subjects were instructed to carry a backpack loaded at no load, 5%, 10%, and 15% body weight in random order. There was a significant difference in the time to reach the THR, the oxygen intake peak time, the maximum metabolic equivalent time, the respiratory rate increase, the minimum oxygen amount, and the maximum carbon dioxide amount at no load and more than 5% load. However, no significant difference was found between the loads. It is thought that even a 5% backpack load of one's body weight can impose on cardiopulmonary energy costs, and this is thought to help improve training programs with a gradual increase in mechanical chest load.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Roh, H. & Lee, D., Respiratory function of university students living at high altitude. J Phys Ther Sci, Vol.26, No.9, 2014, pp. 1489- 1492. doi:10.1589/jpts.26.1489. 2. Verhoeff, K. & Mitchell, J.R., Cardiopulmonary physiology: why the heart and lungs are inextricably linked. Adv Physiol Educ, Vol.41, No.3, 2017, pp. 348-353. doi:10.1152/advan.00190.2016. 3. Deoras, K.S., Greenspan, J.S., Wolfson, M.R., Keklikian, E.N., Shaffer, T.H., & Allen, J.L., Effects of inspiratory resistive loading on chest wall motion and ventilation: differences between preterm and full-term infants. Pediatr Res, Vol.32, No.5, 1992, pp. 589-594. doi:10.1203/00006450-199211000-00022. 4. Heredia-Jimenez, J. & Orantes-Gonzalez, E., Exploring the physiological benefits of carrying a suspended backpack versus a traditional backpack. Ergonomics, Vol.67, No.1, 2024, pp. 95-101. doi:10.1080/00140139.2023.2205621. 5. Knapik, J.J., Reynolds, K.L., & Harman, E., Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med, Vol.169, No.1, 2004, pp. 45-56. doi:10.7205/milmed.169.1.45.
|
|