Coherency calculations in the presence of structural dip
-
Published:1999-01
Issue:1
Volume:64
Page:104-111
-
ISSN:0016-8033
-
Container-title:GEOPHYSICS
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:GEOPHYSICS
Author:
Marfurt Kurt J.1, Sudhaker V.2, Gersztenkorn Adam1, Crawford Kelly D.1, Nissen Susan E.1
Affiliation:
1. AMOCO Expl. & Prod. Technology Group, 4502 East 41st Street, P.O. Box 3385, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74102-3385. Emails: 2. Coherence Technology Corp./Pulsonic, 4343 Second Street NW, Calgary, AB T2KOZ2, Canada.
Abstract
We have used crosscorrelation, semblance, and eigenstructure algorithms to estimate coherency. The first two algorithms calculate coherency over a multiplicity of trial time lags or dips, with the dip having the highest coherency corresponding to the local dip of the reflector. Partially because of its greater computational cost, our original eigenstructure algorithm calculated coherency along an implicitly flat horizon. Although generalizing the eigenstructure algorithm to search over a range of test dips allowed us to image coherency in the presence of steeply dipping structures, we were somewhat surprised that this generalization concomitantly degenerated the quality of the fault images in flatter dip areas. Because it is a local estimation of reflector dip (including as few as five traces), the multidip coherency estimate provides an algorithmically correct, but interpretationally undesirable, estimate of the best apparent dip that explained the offset reflectors across a fault. We ameliorate this problem using two methods, both of which require the smoothing of a locally inaccurate estimate of regional dip. We then calculate our eigenstructure estimate of coherency only along the dip of the reflector, thereby providing maximum lateral resolution of reflector discontinuities. We are thus both better able to explain the superior results obtained by our earliest eigenstructure analysis along interpreted horizon slices, yet able to extend this resolution to steeply dipping reflectors on uninterpreted cubes of seismic data.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference11 articles.
1. Bahorich, M. S., and Farmer, S. L., 1995, 3-D seismic coherency for faults and stratigraphic features: The Leading Edge, 1053–1058. 2. 1996, Methods of seismic signal processing and exploration: U.S. Patent 5 563 949. 3. Dalley, R. M., Gevers, E. E. A., Stampli, G. M., Davies, D. J., Gastaldi, C. N., Ruijtenberg, P. R., and Vermeer, G. J. D., 1989, Dip and azimuth displays for 3-D seismic interpretation: First Break,7, 86–95. 4. Gersztenkorn, A., and Marfurt, K. J., 1996a, Coherency computations with eigenstructure: 58th Internat. Mtg., Eur. Assn. Geoscientist and Engineers, Extended Abstracts, x031. 5. 1996b, Eigenstructure based coherence computations: 66th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 328–331.
Cited by
275 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|