Virulence genes in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolated from blood culture in haematological patients

Author:

Fedorova A.V.1,Khrulnova S.A.1,Molchanova I.V.2,Kutsevalova O.Yu.3,Klyasova G.A.1,Vetokhina A.V.4

Affiliation:

1. National Medical Research Center for Hematology (Moscow, Russia)

2. Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital (Chelyabinsk, Russia)

3. National Medical Research Centre for Oncology (Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

4. Irkutsk Regional Clinical Hospital (Irkutsk, Russia)

Abstract

Objective. To study virulence genes in E. faecium and E. faecalis isolated from the blood cultures of patients with hematological diseases. Materials and Methods. Virulence genes were studied in E. faecium and E. faecalis strains isolated from blood culture from hematological patients in four Russian hospitals (2002–2020). Susceptibility to vancomycin was determined by broth microdilution method (CLSI, 2022). Virulence genes (esp, hyl, asa1, cylA and gelE) in E. faecium and E. faecalis as well as vancomycin resistance genes (vanA, vanB and vanD) in Enterococcus spp. were detected by multiplex PCR. Results. A total of 551 Enterococcus spp. strains were studied, of them 440 (79.9%) were E. faecium and 111 (20.1%) E. faecalis. Resistance to vancomycin was detected in 86 (19.5%) E. faecium, of them 62 (72.1%) carried vanA and 24 (27.9%) vanB genes. One (1.1%) of 111 E. faecalis was vancomycinintermediate (MIC 16 μg/ml) with vanD gene. Virulence genes were detected in 86.2% of Enterococcus spp., significantly more often among E. faecalis (95.5%) compared to E. faecium (83.9%, p = 0.003). The predominant genes in E. faecium were esp (70.2%) and hyl (52.1%), the detection of the asa1, cylA and gelE genes was minimal. Other genes dominated in E. faecalis: gelE (66.7%), asa1 (65.8%), cylA (36.9%). Statistically significant differences between E. faecium and E. faecalis were determined for all studied virulence genes (p < 0.0001). A combination of three or more virulence genes was detected significantly more often among E. faecalis in comparison with E. faecium (45% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.0001), whereas the presence of one gene or their absence prevailed in E. faecium (40.2% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.0001; 16.1% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.003, respectively). When comparing the two study periods (2002–2010 and 2011–2020), E. faecalis showed a significant increase in the proportion of strains with a combination of three or more virulence genes from 33.3% to 55% (p = 0.03), in E. faecium – with one virulence gene (from 31.7% to 46.3%, p = 0.002) and no genes (from 6.6% to 23%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions. Differences in the frequency of detection of virulence genes and their spectrum have been identified between E. faecium and E. faecalis strains. Virulence genes are significantly more often detected in E. faecalis with a predominance of combinations of three or more genes.

Publisher

Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Reference39 articles.

1. Klyasova G.A. Antimicrobial therapy. In: Program treatment of blood system diseases. Ed.: Savchenko V.G., Moscow: Praktika, 2012. Russian.

2. Klyasova G.A., Okhmat V.A. Antimicrobial therapy. In: Algorithms of diagnosing and protocols of treatment of blood system diseases. Ed.: Savchenko V.G. Moscow: Praktika, 2018. Russian.

3. Klyasova G.A., Fedorova A.V., Frolova I.N., Khrulnova S.A., Vetokhina A.V., Kaporskaya T.S., et al. Antimicrobial resistance nosocomial Enterococcus spp., isolated from blood culture in patients with hematological malignancies. Kliniceskaa mikrobiologia i antimikrobnaa himioterapia. 2018;20(2):142-147. Russian. DOI: 10.36488/cmac.2018.2.142-149

4. Sidorenko S.V. Infectious process as a “Dialog” between host and parasite. Kliniceskaa mikrobiologia i antimikrobnaa himioterapia. 2001;3(4):301-315. Russian.

5. García-Solache M., Rice L. The Enterococcus: a model of adaptability to its environment. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(2):e00058-18. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00058-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3