Abstract
The article analyses the second opinion strategy, which involves providing patients with the opportunity to obtain a second (different) opinion from a qualified specialist in cases where patients are not sure of the correctness of their diagnosis or want to consider other treatment options. The use of second opinion in general medicine and in psychiatry is compared. It is pointed out that it is rare to get a second opinion in psychiatry, and there is very little scientific research on this issue in both general and forensic psychiatry. It is concluded that the lack of demand for the concept of second opinion on the part of psychiatrists is associated with many factors, in particular with the prevalence of diagnostic and therapeutic relativism. It is argued that psychiatrists should reconsider their attitude to the concept of second opinion, gain communication skills with patients on the topics of substantiating the correctness of their own diagnostic conclusion and create criteria for an objective assessment of the qualifications of doctors.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献