Results of applying author’s manual method for repositioning shoulder dislocation

Author:

Slabospitskii Maksim A.ORCID,Mokhov Dmitrii Ye.ORCID,Tkachenko Aleksandr N.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shoulder joint dislocation is the most frequent among all types of dislocations. There are many ways to correct a dislocation of the shoulder. There are many ways to reduce a dislocated shoulder in both outpatient and inpatient settings. The results of conservative treatment of patients with shoulder dislocation are not always positive. AIM: To analyze the results of the authors manual technique for repositioning shoulder dislocation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from 2013 to 2020 inclusive with unselected sampling; the study base is the trauma center of the City Hospital No. 1 by N.I. Pirogov. Criteria for including the patients in the study primary dislocation of the shoulder. Diagnosis: Closed traumatic dislocation of the shoulder in total 1968 people. Non-inclusion criteria secondary dislocation. In the outpatient setting, successful reduction of the shoulder was carried out in 1159 (58.9%) patients; after unsuccessful reduction, 809 (41.1%) patients were hospitalized with shoulder dislocation. The outpatient patients were randomly divided into two groups: in group 1 (n = 1552) the shoulders were adjusted using traditional methods with local anesthesia, the patients in group 2 (n = 416) received treatment according to the authors manual technique without local anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and type of dislocation in both groups. RESULTS: The use of manual techniques was effective in 85% of the cases (352 people), 64 people were hospitalized (15%). The effectiveness of using traditional methods with the use of local anesthesia was 52% (dislocation was repositioned in 807 patients), the rest of the patients were treated in the inpatient setting. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the authors manual technique in patients with shoulder dislocation in the outpatient setting has higher efficiency compared to traditional methods due to the fact that more patients receive assistance in the outpatient setting. In addition, this type of treatment is carried out without anesthesia, which also reduces the cost of treatment.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3