Intraperitoneal perforations of the bladder in pediatric urological practice. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of various therapeutic and diagnostic approaches

Author:

Shchedrov Dmitry N.ORCID,Shormanov Igor S.ORCID,Logval Aleksei A.ORCID,Morozov Evgeny V.ORCID,Garova Daria Yu.ORCID,Sidorova Natalia A.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal damage to the bladder in the pediatric population is a rare phenomenon. Publications describe small series of observations, generalizing studies are isolated. There are no uniform diagnostic algorithms and tactics of patient management, a large number of diagnostic and tactical errors. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the possibilities of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of patients under 18 years of age with intraperitoneal bladder injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The work was based on the results of treatment of 16 patients with intraperitoneal perforations of the bladder under the age of 18, who were in the Regional Pediatric Clinical Hospital (Yaroslavl) and Vologda Regional Children’s Hospital No.2 (Cherepovets) for the period 2003–2023. In 10 cases, the perforations were traumatic in nature, in 6 — iatrogenic in nature. RESULTS: Surgical treatment was performed with traditional access in 6 cases, laparoscopic — in 10. The groups of patients are similar in clinical parameters. Laparotomic surgical intervention was performed from the lower median access (n = 4) and Pfanenstiel access (n = 2); with laparoscopic intervention (n = 10), a trocar arrangement with umbilical access for the camera and two accesses in the iliac regions for instruments was used. Laparoscopic surgery was accompanied by less blood loss. The duration of bladder drainage with laparoscopic intervention is reduced by 1.7 days. Laparoscopic surgery in 1 case was accompanied by the installation of a cystostomy, in the rest drainage was carried out by catheterization of the bladder. Open surgery was mainly completed by performing a cystostomy or combined drainage with a cystostomy and a urethral catheter. The duration of hospitalization is significantly shorter after laparoscopic intervention. In the first 10 years (2002–2012) 5 open operations and 2 laparoscopic operations were performed, and in the second 10 years (2013–2023) — 8 laparoscopic and one open operations. The tactics regarding bladder drainage are changing: in the first analyzed period, drainage was carried out mainly by cystostomy (n = 5) and less often by urethral catheter (n = 2), subsequently — mainly by urethral catheter (n = 7), less often by cystostomy (n = 1) or by simultaneous drainage by stoma and catheter (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic suturing is the method of choice in all cases of isolated intraperitoneal perforations of the bladder and in most combined injuries. Indications for open intervention are combined abdominal injuries, active intra-abdominal bleeding. The urethral catheter has advantages over cystostomy.

Publisher

ECO-Vector LLC

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3