Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effects of pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP) and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) on the accurate visual acuity (VA) measurement in adults.
Methods: Medical files of 282 eyes of 141 patients who underwent VA measurement in our electrophysiology laboratory and did not undergo simulation were retrospectively analyzed. The VA was measured using the Snellen chart. Only those with a VA of higher than 1/10 on the Snellen chart were included in the study. The VA was assessed and reported by the pVEP (VA-pVEP) and sVEP test (VA-sVEP). The correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation analysis.
Results: Of 141 patients, 92 were males and 49 were females with a mean age of 37.7±18.4 years. There was a strong positive correlation between the VA measured by the Snellen chart and the VA measured by pVEP (VA-pVEP) (r=0.858, p<0.001). There was a weak positive correlation (r=0.267, p<0.001) between the VA measured by the Snellen chart and the VA measured by the sVEP (VA-sVEP). A weak positive correlation was found for the VA-pVEP and VA-sVEP (r=0.313, p<0.001).
Conclusions: For the measurement of the degree of the VA, it seems reasonable to use pVEP initially, while sVEP should be used in cases with short attention span and those who are noncooperative and in infants.
Reference28 articles.
1. - Weinstein GW. Clinical aspects of the visually evoked potential. Ophthalmic Surg. 1978;9:56–65.
2. - Arden GB, Lewis DR. The pattern visual evoked response in the assessment of visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1973;93:39–48.
3. - Jeon J, Oh S, Kyung S. Assessment of visual disability using visual evoked potentials BMC Ophthalmol. 2012; 12: 36.
4. - Szabela DA, Pałenga-Pydyn D. Usefulness of visual evoked potentials in visual acuity examination]. Klin Oczna. 2001;103:141-5.
5. - Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Mizota A, Tormene AP. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials. (2016 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2016;133:1-9.