Evolution of techno-nationalism: The role of the space factor

Author:

Zhuravlova Liudmyla1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University

Abstract

Technological changes of the last four decades (1980s ‒ 2020s) encourage scientists of various fields to assess the impact of technologies on the transformation of the system of international relations and national strategies of states. In particular, the main focus of many studies is devoted to the system of relations between countries with conflicting technological interests. Therefore, in the presented article, let’s focus on the theoretical understanding of the evolution of the concept of techno-nationalism. Consideration of techno-nationalism through the prism of space policy, in particular US-China relations, is appropriate from the point of view of determining the relevance of the obtained research results. In view of this, the research methodology is based on an interdisciplinary approach, which made it possible to look at the problem through the perspective of historical, economic, political sciences and the theory of international relations. The analysis of publications on this issue shows that the development of techno-nationalism took place in a dichotomous relationship with techno-globalism. In the context of the end of the Cold War, techno-nationalism was used to refer to the protectionist policies of states that opposed the free exchange of technology. Space technology, which is an indicator of leadership and has a dual purpose, has become an important element of interstate communication in the post-bipolar era. Changes in this system led to an attempt by the United States to balance the interests of national security and commercial benefits from the use of space. However, these efforts led to a further strengthening of the export control regime from the second half of the 1990s. These restrictions were mainly based on concerns about the transfer of space technology to China, which was showing signs of military modernization. Thus, the leadership challenge facing the US and China in the space industry continued to strengthen the techno-nationalist elements of innovation systems throughout the 2000s and 2010s. Based on the views of the studied scientists, the author of the article provides his own definition of techno-nationalism as a state policy, scientific approach and ideology where national factors play a key role. The results of the study showed that the components of technological systems can be affected by the process of globalization to varying degrees. And therefore, techno-globalism and techno-nationalism are components of these systems and demonstrate interdependence. In this light, such categories as digital nationalism, digital identity, and techno-authoritarianism need further development.

Publisher

State University of Infrastructure and Technologies

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Museology,Archeology,History,Archeology

Reference62 articles.

1. A Technology Policy for America Six Broad Initiatives by Bill Clinton. (1992). A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/effector/3/8

2. Abbey, G., & Lane, N. (2009). United States Space Policy: Challenges and Opportunities Gone Astray. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.amacad.org/sites/default/files/publication/downloads/spaceUS.pdf

3. Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on Cooperation in Science and Technology. (1979). China-U.S. science and technology agreement. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/node/4812404

4. Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1997). Technological globalisation or national systems of innovation? Futures, 29(2), 121‒137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-3287(96)00072-9

5. Bloembergen, N., Patel, C. K., Avizonis, P., Clem, R. G., Hertzberg, A., Johnson, T. H., ... & York, H. (1987). Report to The American Physical Society of the study group on science and technology of directed energy weapons. Reviews of Modern Physics, 59(3), 1‒200. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.59.S1

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3