On Combining Instance Selection and Discretisation: A Comparative Study of Two Combination Orders

Author:

Sue Kuen-Liang1ORCID,Tsai Chih-Fong1ORCID,Yan Tzu-Ming1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Information Management, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Abstract

Data discretisation focuses on converting continuous attribute values to discrete ones which are closer to a knowledge-level representation that is easier to understand, use, and explain than continuous values. On the other hand, instance selection aims at filtering out noisy or unrepresentative data samples from a given training dataset before constructing a learning model. In practice, some domain datasets may require processing with both discretisation and instance selection at the same time. In such cases, the order in which discretisation and instance selection are combined will result in differences in the processed datasets. For example, discretisation can be performed first based on the original dataset, after which the instance selection algorithm is used to evaluate the discrete type of data for selection, whereas the alternative is to perform instance selection first based on the continuous type of data, then using the discretiser to transfer the attribute type of values of a reduced dataset. However, this issue has not been investigated before. The aim of this paper is to compare the performance of a classifier trained and tested over datasets processed by these combination orders. Specifically, the minimum description length principle (MDLP) and ChiMerge are used for discretisation, and IB3, DROP3 and GA for instance selection. The experimental results obtained using ten different domain datasets show that executing instance selection first and discretisation second perform the best, which can be used as the guideline for the datasets that require performing both steps. In particular, combining DROP3 and MDLP can provide classification accuracy of 0.85 and AUC of 0.8, which can be regarded as the representative baseline for future related researches.

Funder

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3