Using Value-Focused Thinking and Multicriteria Decision Making to Evaluate Energy Transition Alternatives

Author:

Höfer Tim12ORCID,von Nitzsch Rüdiger3ORCID,Madlener Reinhard452ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), E.ON Energy Research Center, School of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany;

2. Institute for Decision Research and Financial Services, School of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany;

3. School of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany;

4. Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway

5. Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), E.ON Energy Research Center, School of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Abstract

The future transformation of the energy system is a contentious topic, involving a variety of conflicting opinions and interests. In order to structure and evaluate these opinions, we develop a decision-making process with professional stakeholders and energy experts. The aim of this process is to develop a common objective system for the energy transition and to evaluate four possible energy transition alternatives for Germany until 2030. We apply value-focused thinking to define and structure the objectives of the stakeholders and use multiattribute utility theory to evaluate the preferences of the stakeholders toward these objectives. The results show that 8 out of 11 stakeholders prefer the energy transition alternative with the highest climate protection ambitions. Only 3 stakeholders favor the pan-European alternative, where Germany’s power system is further integrated into the European energy system.

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Subject

General Decision Sciences

Reference15 articles.

1. Multi-Criteria Applications in Renewable Energy Analysis, a Literature Review

2. Becker W, Chinnis JC (2010) A community safety system balancing risk, cost and freedom. OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE Seattle (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 1–9.

3. NEP (2019) Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2030, version 2019: Zweiter Entwurf der Übertragungsnetzbetreiber. Report, 50Hertz Transmission GmbH, Berlin; Amprion GmbH, Dortmund; TenneT TSO GmbH, Bayreuth; and TransnetBW GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany.

4. Hänlein R, El-Alaoui A (2015) Public participation and transparency in power grid planning. Report, Germanwatch Nord-Süd Initiative e.V., Bonn, Germany.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3