Auditory feedback effect of self-pacing treadmill walking in comparison to overground walking

Author:

Evans Trevor V.ORCID,Reissman Megan E.,Reissman Timothy,Shelhamer Mark,Chaudhari Ajit M. W.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractSelf-pacing treadmills provide advantages for assessing locomotion, but there are differences between gait patterns in overground and treadmill paradigms. A potential explanation could be that the variable auditory sound from the treadmill belt motors when changing speed provides artificial sensory feedback to walkers that may influence their motor output while on the self-pacing treadmill. We hypothesized that there would be significantly different temporal measures between the sound and no-sound conditions, and these same measures from the no-sound condition would be similar to overground walking. Participants (n=29) walked under three different conditions for five-minute periods each: on the self-pacing treadmill with sound inclusion, on the self-pacing treadmill with sound exclusion, and overground walking. Significant differences were found in the variability of all temporal walking measurements between the overground and both treadmill conditions (p < 0.05). Effects of sound on temporal walking measurements were not observed. The lack of difference between the two treadmill conditions suggests that self-pacing treadmill walkers may not utilize the variable belt motor sounds available to them. Additionally, overground walking still has different gait patterns compared to self-pacing treadmill walking, so other potential sources of differences should be explored in future work. Given that both treadmill conditions had different temporal gait patterns from overground, considerations for using the self-pacing treadmill as an alternative for overground walking should be taken when studying human locomotion.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3