Correlations between patterns of activity and the response to treatment yield distinct signatures for different antidepressive treatments

Author:

Spulber StefanORCID,Elberling FrederikORCID,Ceccatelli SandraORCID,Gärde MartinORCID,Tiger MikaelORCID,Lundberg JohanORCID

Abstract

AbstractWrist actigraphy is a non-invasive technology to monitor activity over extended periods of time. Specific alterations in circadian patterns of activity have been described in several psychiatric disorders and are associated with symptom severity in major depressive disorder (MDD). The aim of this study was to investigate the correlations between activity patterns and the response to different MDD treatments. We used actigraphy recordings acquired for 3 independent clinical trials investigating the response to internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), escitalopram, or ketamine. We designed a feature extraction procedure applicable both to recordings spanning a single circadian cycle, and to average circadian profiles. First, we investigated the effects of MDD treatments independently from magnitude of response, and found that each treatment altered a specific subset of features. We next asked whether features of activity patterns before treatment correlate with the magnitude of response to MDD treatment, and whether the correlations are treatment-specific. We found distinct signatures in the correlations between longitudinal changes in individual features and the response to different treatments. Next, we trained linear regression ensembles to model the response to treatment using the patterns of activity during the depressive episode and ran in-depth analysis of coefficients to characterize the differences between treatments. We found that better response is associated with higher between-days variability for iCBT, and with lower between-days variability for ketamine, while lower within-day fragmentation was common to both treatments. Our data suggests that the analysis of circadian patterns of activity can potentially be used for predicting the response to different MDD treatments, however larger confirmatory studies are required for future clinical applications.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3