Comparison of single nucleotide variants identified by Illumina and Oxford Nanopore technologies in the context of a potential outbreak of Shiga Toxin ProducingEscherichia coli

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to compare Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing data from the two isolates of STEC O157:H7 to determine whether concordant single nucleotide variants were identified and whether inference of relatedness was consistent with the two technologies.ResultsFor the Illumina workflow, the time from DNA extraction to availability of results, was approximately 40 hours in comparison to the ONT workflow where serotyping, Shiga toxin subtyping variant identification were available within seven hours. After optimisation of the ONT variant filtering, on average 95% of the discrepant positions between the technologies were accounted for by methylated positions found in the described 5-Methylcytosine motif sequences, CC(A/T)GG. Of the few discrepant variants (6 and 7 difference for the two isolates) identified by the two technologies, it is likely that both methodologies contain false calls.ConclusionsDespite these discrepancies, Illumina and ONT sequences from the same case were placed on the same phylogenetic location against a dense reference database of STEC O157:H7 genomes sequenced using the Illumina workflow. Robust SNP typing using MinION-based variant calling is possible and we provide evidence that the two technologies can be used interchangeably to type STEC O157:H7 in a public health setting.