A cross sectional survey of Australian and New Zealand specialist trainees’ research experiences and outputs

Author:

Stehlik PaulinaORCID,Withers CaitlynORCID,Bourke RachelORCID,Barnett AdrianORCID,Brandenburg CaitlinORCID,Noble ChristyORCID,Bannach-Brown AlexandraORCID,Keijzers GerbenORCID,Scott IanORCID,Glasziou PaulORCID,Veysey EmmaORCID,Mickan SharonORCID,Morgan MarkORCID,Joshi Hitesh,Forrest KirstyORCID,Campbell Thomas,Henry DavidORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo explore medical trainees’ experiences and views concerning college-mandated research projects.SettingOnline survey (Apr-Dec 2021) of current and recent past trainees of Australian and New Zealand colleges recruited through 11 principal colleges and snowballing.ParticipantsCurrent trainee or completed training in the past 5 years.Main outcome measuresWe asked participants: whether they were required to conduct research as part of their college training, how they conducted their research, and their research activity after training. Respondents were invited to submit project reports for reporting and methodological quality evaluation. Data were analysed descriptively.ResultsOf the 372 respondents, 313 (86%) were required to complete one or more projects. Of the 177 who had completed their project (representing 267 projects), 76 provided information on 92 studies, with 34 reports submitted for evaluation. Most respondents developed their own research questions, study design and protocol, and conducted research in their own time, with 56% (38/68) stating they had the skills to complete their project. Most project teams consisted of their own medical specialty followed by statisticians, but seldom others.44% (30/68) were satisfied with their research experience, and 53% (36/67) supported mandatory projects. Half (87/174) felt research was important for career development, 72% (44/61) considered initiating research post-training, and 54% (33/61) participated in it.Commonly expressed themes were time-burden of conducting projects, production of research waste, and the importance of research for skills development. Of the 34 submitted reports, 75% were published and 82% had a clear research question. Only three had a low risk of bias.ConclusionMajority of respondents conducted projects, but few shared details or reports. Despite valuing their research experiences and seeing clinical relevance, time conflicts and research waste were common concerns. Colleges should focus on enhanced research methods training and creating trainee research collaboratives.Protocol registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BNGZKSummary boxMajority of medical specialty trainees are required to conduct a research project to develop their research skills.We found the learning experiences are inconsistent, and the quality of research produced even more so.A new approach is required that is tailored to the research skills required by most practicing clinicians, namely being expert in applying research to practice and in participating in collaborative research. Those wishing to become leaders in research should be supported to do so via a specialised well-supported pathway.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference54 articles.

1. Frank J , Snell L , Sherbino J. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. In: Canada RCoPaSo, editor. Ottawa 2015.

2. Medical School Accreditation Committee Standards for Assessment and Accreditation of Primary Medical Programs by the Australian Medical Council 2012 ACT, Australia 2012 [Available from: https://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/accreditation_recognition/primary-medical-education/Standards-for-Assessment-and-Accreditation-of-Primary-Medical-Programs-by-the-Australian-Medical-Council-2012.pdf.

3. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Milestones Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education,; 2019 [Available from: https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Milestones/Overview.

4. Postgraduate Medical Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Spanning 26 Years and Lessons Learned

5. The postgraduate medical education pathway: an international comparison;GMS J Med Educ,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The trainee research curriculum: Time to ENHANCE it?;Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology;2024-08-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3