Intra-aortic balloon pump is associated with the lowest whereas Impella with the highest inpatient mortality and complications regardless of severity or hospital types (rural or university) or after adjustment for 47 high risk variables and baseline characteristics by studying over 800,000 inpatients with cardiogenic shock

Author:

Movahed Mohammad Reza,Talle Armin,Hashemzadeh Mehrtash

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundImpella and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) are commonly utilized in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, the effect on mortality remains controversial. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of Impella and IABP on mortality and complications in patients with cardiogenic shock.MethodThe large Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to study any association between the use of IABP or Impella on mortality and complications in adults with a diagnosis of cardiogenic shocks.ResultsICD-10 codes for Impella, IABP, and cardiogenic shock for available years 2016-2020 were utilized. A total of 844,020 patients had a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock. 101,870 were treated with IABP and 39,645 with an Impella. Total inpatient mortality without any device was 34.2% vs only 25.1% with IABP use (OR=0.65, CI 0.62-0.67) but was highest at 40.7% with Impella utilization (OR=1.32, CI 1.26-1.39). Using multivariate analysis adjusting for 47 variables such as age, gender, race, lactose acidosis, three-vessel intervention, left main myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, systolic heart failure, acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, chronic renal disease, etc., Impella utilization remained associated with the highest mortality (OR: 1.33, CI 1.25-1.41, p<0.001) whereas IABP remained associated with the lowest mortality (OR: 0.69, CI 0.66-0.72, p<0.001). Separating rural vs teaching hospitals revealed similar findings.ConclusionIn patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of Impella was associated with the highest whereas the utilization of IABP was associated with the lowest in hospital mortality regardless of comorbid condition, high-risk futures, or type of hospital.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3