Abstract
ABSTRACTThe lack of nuclear estrogen receptor (ERα and ERβ) bindings of 10β-hydroxyestra-1,4-diene-3,17-dione (HEDD) and structurally related steroidal para-quinols have been shown by an extensive series of multidisciplinary investigational evidence including specific receptor binding studies. In support of the latter, the absence of estrogen-derived para-quinols’ in vivo uterotrophic effects has also been well documented. Via in silico docking, a recent publication by Canário et al. (2022) reported a robust binding of HEDD (Figure 1B) to ERα. The authors claimed a strong binding of HEDD — as strong as that of its natural ligand, 17β-estradiol (E2), the main human estrogen. However, an examination of the virtual binding pocket revealed that at least one residue near the critical ligand-binding site of their reported HEDD–ERα complex was labelled as “unknown” indicating thereby alteration of the receptor’s published structure (Tannenbaum et al, 1998; Bafna et al., 2020) to fit the ligand. Based on these arguments, the contradictory result by Canário et al. (2022) on HEDD’s binding to ERα should be dismissed.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory