Randomized trial to compare acceptability of Magnesium Sulphate administration for preeclampsia and eclampsia: Springfusor pump versus standard of care

Author:

Ononge SamORCID,Nakimuli Annettee,Byamugisha Josephat,Adroma Moses,Kiondo Paul,Easterling Thomas,Bracken Hillary

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionIn low-resource settings, magnesium sulphate (MgSO4)for preeclampsia is administered majorly through an injection into the gluteal muscles 4-hourly for 24 hours. The repeated injections are very painful and may lead to infection, abscess formation and reduced compliancy.ObjectiveTo determine the acceptability of Springfusor® pump for the administration of Magnesium Sulphate in preeclampsia and eclampsia.DesignRandomized Open Label Clinical TrialMethodStudy was conducted at Kawempe National Referral Hospital. Eligible women had systolic blood pressure of ≤40mmHg and or diastolic blood pressure >90mmHg, proteinuria ≤+1, and physician’s decision to start on MgSO4. Four-hundred-ninety-six participants were randomized to Springfusor® pump group or control (standard of care) administration of MgSO4. Intervention group had loading dose (4gm of 50% MgSO4intravenously over 20 minutes) and maintenance therapy (1gm of 50% MgSO4intravenously per hour for 24 hours) administered using the Springfusor®. The control group received a loading dose of 4gm of 20% MgSO4IV over 15-20 minutes, followed by 10gm of 50% MgSO4intramuscular (5gm in each buttock) and maintenance dose of 5gm of 50% MgSO4was administered IM every 4 hours for 24 hours. Both arms received the rest of the care for preeclampsia/eclampsia as per the hospital guidelines.Acceptability of method of administration was assessed using a Likert scale (1-5; 1 and 2: acceptable and 3-5: unacceptable). Pain at site of MgSO4administration was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale 1-7, (1 minimal pain and 7 worst pain). Comparisons were assessed with X-square and Students’ t-test.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Intervention arm was; more acceptable than the standard of care arm, (94.9% vs70.3%; p<0.001), had lower pain score (2.2±1.3 vs. 4.1±1.6; p <0.001) and fewer side effects. Maternal mortality was comparable between groups (0.8% in intervention arm vs 1.2% in the IM arm).TRIAL REGISTRATIONTrial No PACTR201712002887266 (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/)

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3