The effects of oxygenation on acute vasodilator challenge in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Author:

Rockstrom Matthew DORCID,Jin Ying,Peterson Ryan A,Hountras Peter,Badesch David,Gu Sue,Park Bryan,Messenger JohnORCID,Forbes Lindsay M.ORCID,Cornwell William K.,Bull Todd M

Abstract

BackgroundIdentification of long-term calcium channel blocker (CCB) responders with acute vasodilator challenge is critical in the evaluation of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Currently there is no standardized approach for use of supplemental oxygen during acute vasodilator challenge.MethodsRetrospective analysis of patients identified as acute vasoresponders, treated with CCBs. All patients had hemodynamic measurements in three phases: 1) at baseline; 2) with 100% fractional inspired oxygen; and 3) with 100% fractional inspired oxygen plus inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). Patients were divided into two cohorts. Those meeting the definition of acute vasoresponsiveness from phase 2 to phase 3 were labeled “iNO Responders.” Those who did not reach the threshold of acute vasoresponsiveness from phase 2 to phase 3 but did meet the definition from phase 1 to phase 3 were labeled “Oxygen Responders.” Survival, hospitalization for decompensated right heart failure, duration of CCB monotherapy, and functional data were collected.ResultsiNO Responders, when compared to Oxygen Responders, had superior survival (100% vs 50.1% 5-year survival, respectively), fewer hospitalizations for acute decompensated right heart failure (0% vs 30.4% at 1 year, respectively), longer duration of CCB monotherapy (80% versus 52% at 1 year, respectively), and superior six-minute walk distance.ConclusionCurrent guidelines for acute vasodilator testing do not standardize oxygen coadministration with iNO. This study demonstrates that adjusting for the effects of supplemental oxygen before assessing for acute vasoresponsiveness identifies a cohort with superior functional status, tolerance of CCB monotherapy, and survival while on long-term CCB therapy.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3