Interference between Venus-A Valve and Anterior Mitral Valve Leaflets after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insight from FEops HEARTguide simulation

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundScarce data exist regarding the occurrence of mitral valve interference after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Venus-A valve implantation. Several case reports have noted that the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) is mechanically affected by the prosthesis frame, particularly when implanted in a low position. This study aimed to investigate the potential factors influencing the clinical outcomes of AML interference after Venus-A valve implantation.MethodsWe retrospectively included 20 severe aortic valve stenosis patients who had undergone TAVR and had been implanted with the Venus-A valve at our hospital between October 2020 and June 2021. Pre- and post-procedural CT scans were used for the FEops HEARTguide simulation. Anatomically influencing factors were measured using the 3mensio software and derived from the FEops HEARTguide. The prosthesis-AML interference (PAI) was defined when it met both of two criteria:1) significant interference and limited AML movement shown by transthoracic or transoesophageal echocardiography, and 2) more than half cell intersection between the simulated Venus-A valve and the reconstructed AML revealed by the FEops HEARTguide. Anatomical factors and clinical outcomes were compared between the PAI and non-PAI groups.ResultsNine PAI patients and 11 non-PAI cases were identified. PAI was associated with shorter mitral-aortic annulus distance (2.7±1.7 mm vs 5.0±2.2 mm,P= 0.019), larger prosthesis valve size (P= 0.013), deeper implantation (12.2±3.3 mm vs 6.2±2.9 mm at non-coronary cusp side,P< 0.001) and less calcification of non-coronary cusp (median calcification score, 52.2 mm3vs 156.0 mm3,P= 0.046). Regarding the clinical impact, PAI was associated with a higher rate of moderate or severe perivalvular leakage before discharge than those associated with the absence of PAI, with no difference in haemodynamic parameters and incidence of adverse events at the 30-day and 12-month follow-ups between the groups.ConclusionsInterference between the Venus-A prosthesis valve and AML after TAVR was associated with a shorter mitral-aortic annulus distance, larger prosthesis usage, greater implantation depth, and less calcification of the non-coronary cusp. However, further studies are required to explore its long-term clinical impact.