Genetics, primary care records and lifestyle factors for short-term dynamic risk prediction of colorectal cancer: prospective study of asymptomatic and symptomatic UK Biobank participants

Author:

Ip SamanthaORCID,Harrison HannahORCID,Usher-Smith Juliet A.ORCID,Barclay MatthewORCID,Tyrer Jonathan,Dennis JoeORCID,Yang Xin,Lush Michael,Renzi CristinaORCID,Pashayan NoraORCID,Denaxas SpirosORCID,Lyratzopoulos GeorgiosORCID,Antoniou Antonis C.ORCID,Wood AngelaORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo quantify the contributions of polygenic scores, primary care records (presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) and lifestyle factors, for short-term risk prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) in both all and symptomatic individuals.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingUK Biobank with follow-up until 2018.ParticipantsAll participants with linked primary care records (n=160,526), and a subcohort of participants with a presentation of a symptom associated with CRC (n=50,728).Main outcome measuresOutcome was the first recorded CRC diagnosis within two years. Dynamic risk models with time-varying predictors were derived in a super-landmark framework. Contributions to model discrimination were quantified using novel inclusion-order-agnostic Shapley values of Harrel’s C-index using cross-validation.ResultsC-indices [95% CIs] were 0.74 [0.72-0.75] and 0.71 [0.67-0.77] for the models derived in all and symptomatic participants respectively. The Shapley contributions to model discrimination differed between the two groups of participants for different predictors: 31% (32% in the symptomatic participants) for core predictors (e.g., age, sex, smoking), 16% (12%) for polygenic scores, 27% (30%) for primary care blood tests, 14% (14%) for primary care medical history, 8% (0.5%) for additional lifestyle factors and 4% (12%) for symptoms.ConclusionsPolygenic scores contribute substantially to short-term risk prediction for CRC in both general and symptomatic populations; however, the contribution of information in primary care records (including presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) is greater. There is, however, only a small contribution by the additional lifestyle risk factors which are not routinely collected in primary care.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference45 articles.

1. Meeting report from the joint IARC-NCI international cancer seminar series: a focus on colorectal cancer;Ann Oncol,2019

2. NHS digital. Cancer Survival in England, cancers diagnosed 2016 to 2020, followed up to 2021 [Internet]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/cancer-survival-in-england/cancers-diagnosed-2016-to-2020-followed-up-to-2021

3. Do colorectal cancer patients diagnosed as an emergency differ from non-emergency patients in their consultation patterns and symptoms?;A longitudinal data-linkage study in England. Br J Cancer,2016

4. Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests

5. Comparison of screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers in the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3