Choice anticipation as gated accumulation of sensory expectations

Author:

Caie Brandon,Endres Dominik,Khan Aarlenne,Blohm Gunnar

Abstract

AbstractExpectations are combined with sensory information when making choices. Some models of the choice process have conceptualized expectations as trial by trial updates to baseline evidence in an accumulator framework. These models have been successful in explaining the influence of choice history across trials on reaction times and choice probabilities, however they do not account for variability in the delay interval within trials. Here, we derive a gated accumulator that models the onset of evidence accumulation as a combination of delayed sensory information and an expectation of sensory timing that changes within trials. To test how the delay intervals interact with trial by trial expectations, we designed a free choice saccade task where participants directed eye movements, as fast as possible, to either of two targets that appeared with variable delays and asynchronies. Despite being instructed to not to anticipate, participants responded prior to target onset on a subset of trials. We reasoned that anticipatory responses may reflect a trade-off between gating the onset of evidence accumulation prior to target onset and releasing this gate as target appearance became more likely. Using a choice history analysis, we found that anticipatory responses were more likely following repeated choices, despite task randomization, suggesting that the balance between anticipatory and sensory responses was driven by an expectation of sensory timing. By fitting the gated accumulator model to reaction time data, we determined that within-trial fluctuations in baseline evidence occurring prior to the onset of the target could explain the joint increase of anticipatory responses and faster sensory-guided responses as the delay period increased. Thus, we conclude that an expectation of sensory timing can shape how the accumulation of choice evidence is gated, allowing us to balance the costs of anticipation with lowering the amount of evidence required to trigger movement.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3