Challenges in the case-based surveillance of infectious diseases

Author:

Eales OliverORCID,McCaw James M.ORCID,Shearer Freya M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractTo effectively inform infectious disease control strategies, accurate knowledge of the pathogen’s transmission dynamics is required. The infection incidence, which describes the number of new infections in a given time interval (e.g., per day or per week), is fundamental to understanding transmission dynamics, and can be used to estimate the time-varying reproduction number and the severity (e.g., the infection fatality ratio) of a disease. The timings of infections are rarely known and so estimates of the infection incidence often rely on measurements of other quantities amenable to surveillance. Case-based surveillance, in which infected individuals are identified by a positive test, is the pre-dominant form of surveillance for many pathogens, and was used extensively during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there can be many biases present in case-based surveillance indicators due to, for example, test sensitivity and specificity, changing testing behaviours, and the co-circulation of pathogens with similar symptom profiles. Without a full understanding of the process by which surveillance systems generate data, robust estimates of the infection incidence, time-varying reproduction number, and severity based on these data cannot be made. Here we develop a mathematical description of case-based surveillance of infectious diseases. By considering realistic epidemiological parameters and situations, we demonstrate potential biases in common surveillance indicators based on case-based surveillance data. The description is highly general and could be applied to a diverse set of pathogens and situations. The mathematical description could be used to inform inference of infection incidence using existing data, with a full understanding of where bias and uncertainty will be present in any such analysis. Future surveillance strategies could be designed to minimise these sources of bias and uncertainty, providing more accurate estimates of a pathogen’s transmission dynamics and, ultimately, more targeted application of public health measures.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3