Quantitative Assessment of Injectable Medication Delivery Practices

Author:

Aggerwal Salena,Minerbi Amir,Beliveau Lt(N) Peter,Meredith LCol Sean,Lalonde MCpl Sasha,Laurin Erica,Gupta Gaurav

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile medical advances for in-hospital care rapidly evolve, a mainstay of effective pre-hospital care remains the ability to treat medical emergencies such as anaphylaxis, overdosing, and/or uncontrolled bleeding through rapid administration of appropriate medication. Therefore, investigators looked at various injection methods and their possible utility in medical emergencies.Method30 participants were asked to inject ‘medication’ that mimicked three different methods of injection: 1) autoinjectors, 2) prefilled syringes, and 3) traditional standard syringes using clinical scenarios. Three variables that were measured in the study were: the time required to complete the injection, the perceived difficulties, and the participant’s performance errors.ResultsThe perceived difficulty and injection time for the autoinjector device were statistically significantly lower compared to prefilled syringes and standard syringes. No significant difference in errors were seen between platforms.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the gain of efficiency when comparing autoinjectors to other methods of medication administration, like prefilled syringes or drawing medication from vials for administration. The clinical implications of the noted differences are not clear at this time. Many potential limitations exist, including the size of the study, the use of non-clinical participants, the immediate use of platforms after training, and the lack of applied stress in the environment.ConclusionThis study compares autoinjectors to other methods of medication administration; prefilled syringes and standard syringes. Further study in larger datasets with clinicians and/or military personnel is required to compare these platforms in various environments. The outcome of this project provides insights into the relative efficiencies of treating medical emergencies such as anaphylaxis, overdosing, and/or uncontrolled bleeding.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference14 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Study the Interactions of Drugs, Biologics, and Chemicals in U.S. Military Forces; Petersdorf RG , Page WF , Thaul S , editors. Interactions of Drugs, Biologics, and Chemicals in U.S. Military Forces. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1996. 2, Current Prophylactic Agents. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233371/

2. Is intramuscular morphine satisfying frontline medical personnels’ requirement for battlefield analgesia in Helmand Province, Afghanistan? A questionnaire study

3. AAAAI/ACAAI Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Surveillance Study (2013-2017): Fatalities, Infections, Delayed Reactions, and Use of Epinephrine Autoinjectors;J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract [Internet],2019

4. Recent Trends in Fatalities, Waiting Times, and Use of Epinephrine Autoinjectors for Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy (SCIT): AAAAI/ACAAI National Surveillance Study 2008-2016;J Allergy Clin Immunol,2018

5. Autoinjectors preferred for intramuscular epinephrine in anaphylaxis and allergic reactions;West J Emerg Med [Internet],2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3