Treatment of stage I-III squamous cell anal cancer: a comparative effectiveness systematic review

Author:

Troester Alexander1ORCID,Parikh Romil2,Southwell Bronwyn3,Ester Elizabeth4,Sultan Shahnaz5,Greeno Edward6ORCID,Arsoniadis Elliot7,Church Timothy R28,Wilt Timothy9,Butler Mary2,Goffredo Paolo7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

2. School of Public Health, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

3. Department of Anesthesia, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

4. Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

5. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

6. Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

7. Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

8. Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN, USA

9. Minneapolis VA Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research and the University of Minnesota Schools of Medicine and Public Health , Minneapolis, MN, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background We sought to assess the effectiveness and harms of initial treatment strategies for stage I through III anal squamous cell anal cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between January 1, 2000, and March 2024, for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions comparing initial treatment strategies. Individual study risk of bias and overall strength of evidence were evaluated for a prespecified outcome list using standardized methods. Results We identified 33 eligible studies and extracted data. Six were deemed low to moderate risk of bias. Compared with radiation therapy alone, chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C probably shows a benefit in locoregional failure, disease-specific survival, and colostomy-free survival (moderate strength of evidence) yet may result in greater overall and acute hematological toxicity, with no difference in late harms (low strength of evidence). CRT with 5-FU plus mitomycin C may show a benefit in locoregional failure, disease-specific survival, and colostomy-free survival rates compared with 5-FU alone (low strength of evidence). CRT with 5-FU plus cisplatin vs 5-FU plus mitomycin C probably results in no differences in several effectiveness outcomes or overall acute or late harms and probably increases hematological toxicity with mitomycin C (moderate strength of evidence). Compared with CRT using capecitabine plus mitomycin C, CRT with capecitabine plus mitomycin C and paclitaxel may improve overall survival, disease-specific survival, and colostomy-free survival yet cause more acute harms (low strength of evidence). Evidence was insufficient for remaining comparisons. Conclusions CRT with 5-FU plus mitomycin C or 5-FU plus cisplatin is likely more effective yet incurs greater acute hematological toxicity than radiation therapy alone or single-agent CRT. Adding paclitaxel to capecitabine plus mitomycin C may increase treatment efficacy and toxicity. Evidence is insufficient comparing posttreatment surveillance strategies and patient-reported outcomes, highlighting research opportunities.

Funder

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3