The psychological, social, and quality of life outcomes of people with a cardiac implantable electronic device: an umbrella review

Author:

Nicmanis Mitchell1ORCID,Chur-Hansen Anna1ORCID,Oxlad Melissa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide , Level 5, Hughes building North Terrace campus, Adelaide 5000 , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Aims To synthesize the psychological, social, and quality of life outcomes of people with a cardiac implantable electronic device. Methods and results An umbrella review of systematic reviews that reported the psychological, social, or quality of life outcomes of adults with a cardiac implantable electronic device was conducted. This umbrella review was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023437078) and adhered to JBI and PRISMA guidelines. Seven databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, EmCare, PsycINFO, PubMed, and the Web of Science) were searched alongside citation and bibliographic searches. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI Checklist of Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. Due to the heterogeneity of the included reviews, the findings were reported narratively. A total of 14 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria; 11 considered quality of life outcomes, and 3 considered psychological outcomes. Little difference in quality of life was found between people with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and controls; however, a high prevalence of psychological disorders was present. Cardiac resynchronization therapy devices demonstrated improvements in quality of life compared with control groups, alongside possible cognitive benefits. Quality of life did not differ between subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Pacemakers were associated with improved post-implantation quality of life. Conclusion Research on the psychosocial and quality of life outcomes of people with a cardiac implantable electronic device is limited and inconsistent. Given the heterogeneity of the current research, conclusions are uncertain. Nevertheless, some recipients may experience adverse psychosocial complications. Further research employing rigorous methodologies is needed, and healthcare practitioners should provide care that acknowledges the potential for adverse psychosocial experiences. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42023437078

Funder

Australian Government Research Training Program

George Fraser Supplementary Scholarship

University of Adelaide

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Medical–Surgical Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy;Glikson;Eur Heart J,2021

2. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death;Zeppenfeld;Eur Heart J,2022

3. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death;Al-Khatib;Circulation,2018

4. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay;Kusumoto;Circulation,2019

5. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope;Shen;Circulation,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3