Burn Unit Design—The Missing Link for Quality and Safety

Author:

Gus Eduardo12ORCID,Almeland Stian Kreken3,Barnes David4,Elmasry Moustafa5,Singer Yvonne6,Sjöberg Folke7,Steinvall Ingrid5,van Zuijlen Paul89,Cleland Heather610

Affiliation:

1. Division of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada

2. Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada

3. Norwegian National Burn Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

4. St. Andrews Burns Service, Broomsfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK

5. Departments of Hand and Plastic Surgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden

6. Victorian Adult Burns Service, Melbourne, Australia

7. *Burn Center, Department of Hand, Plastic Surgery and Intensive Care, Linköping University Hospital, Sweden

8. Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands

9. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

10. Central Clinical School, Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Abstract The relationship between infrastructure, technology, model of care, and human resources influences patient outcomes and safety, staff productivity and satisfaction, retention of personnel, and treatment and social costs. This concept underpins the need for evidence-based design and has been widely adopted to inform hospital infrastructure planning. The aim of this review is to establish evidence-based, universally applicable key features of a burn unit that support function in a comprehensive patient-centered model of care. A literature search in medical, architectural, and engineering databases was conducted. Burn associations’ guidelines and relevant articles published in English, between 1990 and 2020, were included, and the available evidence is summarized in the review. Few studies have been published on burn unit design in the past 30 years. Most of them focus on the role of design in infection control and prevention and consist primarily of descriptive or observational reports, opportunistic historical cohort studies, and reviews. The evidence available in the literature is not sufficient to create a definitive infrastructure guideline to inform burn unit design, and there are considerable difficulties in creating evidence that will be widely applicable. In the absence of a strong evidence base, consensus guidelines on burn unit infrastructure should be developed, to help healthcare providers, architects, and engineers make informed decisions, when designing new or renovated facilities.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Reference34 articles.

1. The business case for building better hospitals through evidence-based design;Sadler

2. Principles of design of burn units: report of a working group of the British Burn Association and Hospital Infection Society;Members of the Working Party;Burns,1992

3. Influence of a changed care environment on bacterial colonization of burn wounds;Adeniran;Burns,1995

4. The effect of burn nursing units on burn wound infections;Thompson;J Burn Care Rehabil,2002

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3