Exploring the impact of missingness on racial disparities in predictive performance of a machine learning model for emergency department triage

Author:

Teeple Stephanie12,Smith Aria34,Toerper Matthew34,Levin Scott34,Halpern Scott25,Badaki-Makun Oluwakemi6,Hinson Jeremiah3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, PA 19143, United States

2. Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD 21218, United States

4. Clinical Decision Support Solutions, Beckman Coulter , Brea, CA 92821, United States

5. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States

6. Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD 21218, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objective To investigate how missing data in the patient problem list may impact racial disparities in the predictive performance of a machine learning (ML) model for emergency department (ED) triage. Materials and Methods Racial disparities may exist in the missingness of EHR data (eg, systematic differences in access, testing, and/or treatment) that can impact model predictions across racialized patient groups. We use an ML model that predicts patients’ risk for adverse events to produce triage-level recommendations, patterned after a clinical decision support tool deployed at multiple EDs. We compared the model’s predictive performance on sets of observed (problem list data at the point of triage) versus manipulated (updated to the more complete problem list at the end of the encounter) test data. These differences were compared between Black and non-Hispanic White patient groups using multiple performance measures relevant to health equity. Results There were modest, but significant, changes in predictive performance comparing the observed to manipulated models across both Black and non-Hispanic White patient groups; c-statistic improvement ranged between 0.027 and 0.058. The manipulation produced no between-group differences in c-statistic by race. However, there were small between-group differences in other performance measures, with greater change for non-Hispanic White patients. Discussion Problem list missingness impacted model performance for both patient groups, with marginal differences detected by race. Conclusion Further exploration is needed to examine how missingness may contribute to racial disparities in clinical model predictions across settings. The novel manipulation method demonstrated may aid future research.

Funder

National Library of Medicine

National Institutes of Health

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Department of Health and Human Services

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3