The Critical Importance of Asking Good Questions: The Role of Epidemiology Doctoral Training Programs

Author:

Fox Matthew P12,Edwards Jessie K3,Platt Robert45,Balzer Laura B6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

4. Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

5. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

6. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts

Abstract

Abstract Epidemiologic methods have advanced tremendously in the last several decades. As important as they are, even the most sophisticated approaches are unable to provide meaningful answers when the user lacks a clear study question. Yet, instructors have more and more resources on how to conduct studies and analyze data but few resources on how to ask clearly defined study questions that will guide those methods. Training programs have limited time for coursework, and if novel statistical estimation methods become the focus of instruction, programs that go this route may end up underemphasizing the process of asking good study questions, designing robust studies, considering potential biases in the collected data, and appropriately interpreting the results of the analysis. Given the demands for space in curricula, now is an appropriate time to reevaluate what we teach epidemiology doctoral students. We advocate that programs place a renewed focus on asking good study questions and following a comprehensive approach to study design and data analysis in which questions guide the choice of appropriate methods, helping us avoid methods for methods’ sake and highlighting when application of a new method can provide the opportunity to answer questions that were intractable with traditional approaches.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference21 articles.

1. Epidemiology at a time for unity [published correction appears in Int J Epidemiol. 2019:48(1):321];Lau;Int J Epidemiol,2019

2. The future of teaching epidemiology;Werler;Am J Epidemiol,2019

3. The future of observational epidemiology: improving data and design to align with population health;Glymour;Am J Epidemiol,2019

4. Applied epidemiology training needs for the modern epidemiologist;Bensyl;Am J Epidemiol,2019

5. A second chance to get causal inference right: a classification of data science tasks;Hernán;Chance,2019

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3